I’d like to put a economic slant on your angle here if I may. If you zoom right out & look across the long macroeconomic cycle you will observe a long growth cycle interspaced with garden variety recessions that is being fuelled by cost efficiencies found due to free trade in a process of globalization. This is then followed by a hard debt supercycle reset that the last time it occurred plunged the world into a 36 year long trade war interspaced with 2 world wars. Not that accurate data goes back that far, but this cycle has been pulsing all thruout human history, albeit across smaller spheres of influence due to older & slower forms of communication & transportation. Fundamentally speaking all business models no matter the scale succumb to the laws of diminishing returns. Globalization’s engine of economic growth is no different. The opposing protectionist model is simply reactionary to the hard limitations experienced once the available increases in efficiencies are no longer sufficient to offer sufficient growth into the system. Hence when Trump took office the world had been experiencing on aggregate growth levels below the rounding error territory of sub 2%. In any market a timely 1st mover advantage is how you profit. If history inevitable repeats as it always has, the USA moving back toward a protectionist economic model is not only inevitable but a move wherein timely 1st mover advantage is everything. Notwithstanding since Trump’s ellection the USA has experienced quite an uptick across all economic health indicators; however these have been mostly localized to the USA. Emerging markets have never looked worse & G8 economies are trapped into Quantitative Easing death spirals with near emergency cash rates while the USA Fed has in effect stuck a straw into global liquidity being the only economy globally speaking, running hot enough, thus in a position to raise cash rates, hence acting as a capital investment attractor for global liquidity. Going forward the USD could become the safest of harbors medium term, which may help the USA uniquely deal with underlying debt, whilst the rest of the world goes to hell. But longer term protectionist cycles, with overarching low-trust economic conditions, being an environment that typically sees the kind of policy that traps 90% of the worlds populations into using non USD national fiat currencies that are in increasing instances being inflated at rates not seen since Weimar Germany; typically this effect of pushing the debt liabilities of fiat currency creation relatively quickly onto a population via inflation across time frames shorter than a typical 90 day business/billing cycle, typically sees that populations savers fleeced of purchasing power via inflation to fund big government expenditures. Typically this slaughtering of savers sees a move towards better sound money stores of wealth, aka Gresham’s law, all the while trust issues between trading partners courtesy of this weaponization of national fiat currencies also sees a preference back toward sound money in terms of international settlements.

Anyway sorry about the wall of text, TL;DR world can’t afford feminism like it can’t afford big government or welfare, if it experiences a protectionist reset & a subsequent reversion to sound money.

Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/a5w34s/why_women_hate_trump/ebq749j/